United States v. Anthony L. Cavallaro and Gerald J. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant who forced a woman into his car and tried to extract information from her satisfied the Federal Kidnapping Act’s motive clause
• holding that a defendant who forced a woman into his car and tried to extract information from her satisfied the Federal Kidnapping Act’s motive clause
• stating that “[t]he address of a government witness is generally a proper subject of defense inquiry and may be necessary for in- and-out-of-court investigation of a witness”
• upholding limitation on cross-examination that precluded questions concerning the kidnapping victim’s current address
• “It is well-established in this circuit that evidence of subsequent similar acts including other crimes, is admissible . . . .”
• \The address of a government witness is generally a proper subject of defense inquiry and may be necessary for in-and-out-of-court investigation of a witness.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).