Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 705 A.2d 118
  • 119 Md. App. 518
  • 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the prosecutor improperly “implore[d] the jurors to consider their own interests and therefore violate the prohibition against the ‘golden rule’ argument”
  • concluding that the prosecutor improperly \implore[d] the jurors to consider their own interests and therefore violate the prohibition against the `golden rule' argument\
  • disapproving of prosecutor’s comments to jury that the case is “ ‘about the day of reckoning, the day of accountability, the day we say no, Mr. Holmes, no longer will we allow you to spread that poison on the streets’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Sonner, Bloom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.