Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/2/1998
Holmes v. State
Citations
- 705 A.2d 118
- 119 Md. App. 518
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the prosecutor improperly “implore[d] the jurors to consider their own interests and therefore violate the prohibition against the ‘golden rule’ argument”
- concluding that the prosecutor improperly \implore[d] the jurors to consider their own interests and therefore violate the prohibition against the `golden rule' argument\
- disapproving of prosecutor’s comments to jury that the case is “ ‘about the day of reckoning, the day of accountability, the day we say no, Mr. Holmes, no longer will we allow you to spread that poison on the streets’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Sonner, Bloom
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 53×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-30· cited 38×
- Donaldson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 30×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-06· cited 13×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-05· cited 13×
- Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-10· cited 10×
- Schwartz v. JohnsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-27· cited 10×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-01· cited 8×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
- Beads v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-21· cited 5×
- Juliano v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-27· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-12· cited 201×
- Ellerin v. Fairfax SavingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-02-03· cited 138×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-10· cited 78×
- Ayers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-07-21· cited 72×
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-12· cited 58×
- State v. HeppleCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-01· cited 55×
- Mayson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-05· cited 54×
- DENO CONSTANTINE KANARAS v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-05-06· cited 35×
- Neam v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-01-28· cited 13×
- Fairfax Savings, F.S.B. v. EllerinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-03-26· cited 13×
- Solko v. State Roads Commission of State Highway AdministrationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-03-05· cited 11×
- Kulbicki v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-12-01· cited 8×
- Rheubottom v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.