Skip to main content

Holliday v. State

Citations

  • 601 N.E.2d 385
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1608
  • 1992 WL 301590

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • statement also contained allegation of involvement in other non-related eriminal conduct; however, testimony was offered for purpose of explaining how officer was placed in a position to arrest defendant and did not violate defendant's right of confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Hoffman, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.