Skip to main content
· 6/27/1991

Okuly v. State

Citations

  • 574 N.E.2d 315
  • 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 994
  • 1991 WL 115557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no fundamental error in admission of vouching testimony where the defendant was “permitted to repeatedly assail the impression that [the victim] was truthful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Staton, Buchanan, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.