Indiana Supreme Court· 10/4/1989

Williams v. State

Citations

544 N.E.2d 161
1989 Ind. LEXIS 301
1989 WL 117325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

when admissible evidence, supplemented by inadmissible evidence, was sufficient to support conviction, case can be remanded for retrial without offending protections afforded by the double jeopardy clause
“[T]he detective merely testified that the nickname given was that of someone who Ricky believed had fired the weapon, not anyone she knew had fired the weapon.”
before approving admission of the informant’s tips, we require “a reasonable level of assurance that such testimony was not offered by the proponent nor received by the trier of fact as evidence of the truth of the third party’s statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Pivarnik, Shepard, Dickson, Givan, Pi-Varnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.