Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. Bowen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hospital is “dissatisfied” when it did not request reimbursement for costs because its request would have been futile
• noting that “[njeither the fiscal intermediary nor the [Review] Board has the authority to declare regulations invalid”
• noting that statutory language allows the Board “to review and revise a cost report with respect to matters not contested before the fiscal intermediary”
• reviewing and reversing PRRB decision that it lacked jurisdiction to consider provider’s challenge to agency regulation
• the Board has the jurisdiction to consider a provider's appeal which challenges a regulation, even if this claim has not been brought before the fiscal intermediary
• “§ 1395oo(a) of the [Medicare] Act addresses the circumstances in which a provider may invoke the Board’s jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).