Holden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the jury’s finding that the plaintiff sustained only $6,000 in damages was not the result of a mistake, but the result of conflicting evidence at trial; a subsequently incurred medical bill of at least $25,000 could be attributed to a pre- existing condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).