Skip to main content
· 1/26/2001

Genetti v. Catterpillar, Inc.

Citations

  • 621 N.W.2d 529
  • 261 Neb. 98
  • 43 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 829
  • 2001 Neb. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where several claims are asserted against several parties for redress of the same injury, only one satisfaction can be had.”
  • “Although expert testimony pointing to a specific defect would be the best means of proving the existence of a defect in some cases, proof that the warranted product is defective may be circumstantial in nature and may be inferred from the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Connolly, Gerrard, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Wright, Stephan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.