Templeton v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that verdict including separate amounts for disability and pain and suffering was not excessive, without discussing the jury instructions on damages
• holding that verdict including separate amounts for disability and pain and suffering was not excessive, without discussing the jury instructions on damages
• new trial warranted when irrelevant matter may have confused the jury or influenced its view of relevant facts
• new trial warranted when irrelevant matter may have confused the jury or influenced its view of relevant facts
• “Federal law must be followed in construing [a] plaintiffs entitlement to damages in a FELA case.” (citing Brown v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co., 162 Ill. App. 3d 926, 931-32 (1987))
• evidence of prior occurrences relevant to show knowledge and notice of dangerous condition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).