Skip to main content

Holden v. State

Citations

  • 602 P.2d 452
  • 1979 Alas. LEXIS 683

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying five factors to analyze when determining the admissibility of identification testimony: (1) “the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime”; (2) “the witness’ degree of attention”; (3
  • fifteen-year sentence, for assault with intent to commit rape approved, based upon prior criminal history and verified report of another rape
  • identification admissible where police officer stated, “I have a wild hunch,” as he handed a victim two photographs of the same suspect
  • identification reliable in part because taking place \no more than two hours after [the witness] first laid eyes on her assailant\
  • \[The witness] testified at the omnibus hearing that she 'was positive' when she saw the photograph that the man depicted was her assailant. Officer Winkleman specified at that hearing that her identification was without hesitation or doubt.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Matthews, Dimond, Schulz, Boochever, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.