Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 652 P.2d 88
  • 1982 Alas. LEXIS 371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Mann instruction in Howard was prejudicial because the defendant was convicted of a specific intent crime, while the use of the Mann instruction in Menard was “largely irrelevant” because the defendant was only convicted of a general intent crime
  • not plain error to fail to give instruction governing mistake of fact regarding victim’s consent under prior rape law
  • \M.M.'s identification at the scene was certain and without hesitation or equivocation.\
  • discussing method for determining the reliability of an eyewitness identification
  • discussing method for determining the reliability of an eyewitness identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Burke, Matthews, Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.