Konop v. Rosen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \routine\ findings contained in patient medical records generally are admissible hearsay
• explaining that each hearsay- within-hearsay statement may be admitted so long as the basis for admission is separately considered as to each
• holding the basis for admission of each hearsay-within-hearsay statement must be separately considered
• noting that hearsay within hearsay requires a separate basis for admission
• stating an appellate court reviews de novo a trial court evidentiary ruling where the court failed to apply the correct test
• each hearsay-within-hearsay statement may be 6 A-4545-12T3 admitted so long as the basis for admission is separately considered as to each

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).