New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 4/25/2012

Konop v. Rosen

Citations

41 A.3d 773
425 N.J. Super. 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \routine\ findings contained in patient medical records generally are admissible hearsay
explaining that each hearsay- within-hearsay statement may be admitted so long as the basis for admission is separately considered as to each
holding the basis for admission of each hearsay-within-hearsay statement must be separately considered
noting that hearsay within hearsay requires a separate basis for admission
stating an appellate court reviews de novo a trial court evidentiary ruling where the court failed to apply the correct test
each hearsay-within-hearsay statement may be 6 A-4545-12T3 admitted so long as the basis for admission is separately considered as to each

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Messano, Yannotti and Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.