Oswin v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that adoption of legislation with amendments in response to conditional veto renders conditional veto message \strong evidence of legislative intent\
• recognizing that adoption of legislation with amendments in response to conditional veto renders conditional veto message “strong evidence of legislative intent”
• stating that adoption of legislation following conditional veto renders conditional veto message strong evidence of legislative intent
• stating that adoption of legislation following conditional veto renders conditional veto message strong evidence of legislative intent
• stating that statutes in derogation of common law should be interpreted narrowly to make “the least rather than the most major change in the common law.”
• stating that statutes in derogation of common law should be interpreted narrowly to make \the least rather than the most major change in the common law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).