Skip to main content
· 11/28/2011

Hines v. State Room, Inc.

Citations

  • 665 F.3d 235
  • 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 705
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23680
  • 2011 WL 5903863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that employees exercised discretion by “working with a client to create a custom product, personalized to individual tastes and budgets”
  • considering whether the employees' duty was ancillary to the business's \principal function\
  • considering whether the employees' duty was ancillary to the business's \principal function\
  • plaintiff sales managers performed service that was “clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves”
  • “The sales aspect of the defendants’ businesses, although necessary to their success, is clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves.”
  • “The sales aspect of the defendants’ businesses, although necessary to their success, is clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Ripple, Selya

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.