· 11/28/2011
Hines v. State Room, Inc.
Citations
- 665 F.3d 235
- 18 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 705
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23680
- 2011 WL 5903863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that employees exercised discretion by “working with a client to create a custom product, personalized to individual tastes and budgets”
- considering whether the employees' duty was ancillary to the business's \principal function\
- considering whether the employees' duty was ancillary to the business's \principal function\
- plaintiff sales managers performed service that was “clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves”
- “The sales aspect of the defendants’ businesses, although necessary to their success, is clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves.”
- “The sales aspect of the defendants’ businesses, although necessary to their success, is clearly ancillary to the principal function of actually providing the banquet services themselves.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Ripple, Selya
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.