Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 913 S.W.2d 581
  • 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2
  • 1996 WL 6756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the use of belts, chains, and locks to prevent the child from eating constituted the use of a deadly weapon in denying food to the child
  • holding that the use of belts, chains, and locks to prevent the child from eating constituted the use of a deadly weapon in denying food to the child
  • acknowledging that the State had to prove \beyond a reasonable doubt appellant used a deadly weapon\
  • acknowledging that the State had to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt appellant used a deadly weapon”
  • acknowledging that the State had to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt appellant used a deadly weapon”
  • “We agree that the better practice is to submit the deadly weapons special issue charge at the guilt/innocence phase of the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, Baird, Overstreet, Maloney, Clinton, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

129 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.