Skip to main content

Jack v. State

Citations

  • 149 S.W.3d 119
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 517
  • 2004 WL 574533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appeal becomes moot when judgment of appellate court cannot affect existing controversy or cannot affect parties’ rights
  • noting that an appellate court may not consider factual assertions that are outside the record
  • stating that case becomes moot on appeal when appellate court’s judgment “can no longer have an effect on an existing controversy or cannot affect the rights of the parties”
  • noting that an appellate court may not consider factual assertions not in evidence
  • noting that an appellate court may not consider factual assertions not in evidence
  • explaining that appellate courts cannot consider factual assertions outside the appellate record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

84 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.