Skip to main content

Shaffer v. State

Citations

  • 477 S.W.2d 873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • enforcement of rules of procedural default serve no state interest when “the two convictions were in the same court, on the same day, before the same judge, and were based on the same evidence”
  • enforcement of rules of procedural default serve no state interest when “the two convictions were in the same court, on the same day, before the same judge, and were based on the same evidence”
  • enforcement of rules of procedural default serves no state interest when “the two convictions were in the same court, on the same day, before the same judge, and were based on the same evidence”
  • enforcement of rules of procedural default serves no state interest when “the two convictions were in the same court, on the same day, before the same judge, and were based on the same evidence”
  • enforcement of rules 20 of procedural default serves no state interest when “the two convictions were in the same court, on the same day, before the same judge, and were based on the same evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.