Eighth Circuit· 8/30/1989
Hill v. Searle Laboratories
Citations
- 884 F.2d 1064
- 1989 WL 99603
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defect need not be a matter of errors in manufacture ... a product is defective when it is . . . not accompanied by adequate instructions and warnings of the dangers attending its use
- “ ‘defect’ need not be a matter of errors in manufacture ... a product is ‘defective’ when it is . . . not accompanied by adequate instructions and warnings of the dangers attending its use”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beam, Heaney, Magill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2000-10-27· cited 123×
- Craft v. PeeblesHawaii Supreme Court· 1995-04-11· cited 111×
- Humes v. ClintonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-05-25· cited 85×
- Savina v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 67×
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 67×
- West v. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-03-18· cited 65×
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court· 2010-12-30· cited 60×
- Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-12-20· cited 49×
- Adams v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 39×
- Shanks v. Upjohn Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 31×
- State Ex Rel. Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 30×
- Jamison v. Purdue Pharma Co.S.D. Mississippi· 2003-02-05· cited 30×
- Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-23· cited 23×
- Pollard v. AshbyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-05-22· cited 22×
- Zanzuri v. G.D. Searle & Co.S.D. Florida· 1990-09-04· cited 17×
- Witczak v. Pfizer, Inc.D. Minnesota· 2005-07-20· cited 17×
- Connie Hill v. Searle LaboratoriesEighth Circuit· 1989-11-09· cited 14×
- Amore v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.S.D. Florida· 1990-08-16· cited 13×
- Ehlis v. Shire Richwood, Inc.D. North Dakota· 2002-11-13· cited 13×
- Hoppe v. G.D. Searle & Co.S.D. New York· 1991-11-19· cited 10×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-30· cited 248×
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-31· cited 232×
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesFifth Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 219×
- United States v. Article of Drug . . . Bacto-UnidiskSupreme Court· 1969-04-28· cited 196×
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationFirst Circuit· 1981-04-07· cited 157×
- Lydia Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., and Winthrop LaboratoriesSecond Circuit· 1969-10-07· cited 152×
- Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.Ninth Circuit· 1985-07-03· cited 148×
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1978-04-27· cited 139×
- Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1982-07-07· cited 139×
- MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-02-28· cited 134×
- Werner v. Upjohn Co.Fourth Circuit· 1980-08-04· cited 110×
- Hilliard v. A. H. Robins Co.California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-27· cited 109×
- Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationSecond Circuit· 1980-12-08· cited 102×
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,422 Harry Plummer, Cross-Appellant v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 1987-05-19· cited 96×
- McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1982-06-01· cited 93×
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-02-04· cited 86×
- Margaret Sharon Worsham v. A.H. Robins CompanyEleventh Circuit· 1984-06-18· cited 81×
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.D. Minnesota· 1988-02-01· cited 61×
- Patricia W. Salmon, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy B. Salmon, a Minor v. Parke, Davis and CompanyFourth Circuit· 1975-08-11· cited 60×
Other cases named Hill v. Searle Laboratories
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.