Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/25/1990
Humes v. Clinton
Citations
- 792 P.2d 1032
- 246 Kan. 590
- 1990 Kan. LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “viability is an improper condition precedent to recovery when the injured fetus is born alive ... [but] viability is not an illogical condition precedent when a negligently injured fetus is stillborn” because it “has never become an independent living person”
- noting “that viability—the ability to live independently of the mother—is an irrelevant demarcation when a child survives prenatal injuries and is born [alive] with damages suffered within the womb”
- affirming summary judgment for manufacturer based on the “learned intermediary” doctrine
- no genuine issue of fact on adequacy of warning where plaintiffs' own experts testified warning was adequate
- \A majority of states allow an action for wrongful death of a viable fetus even when it is stillborn as a result of the prenatal injuries.\
- because intrauterine devices (IUD’s) are available only through licensed medical care providers, the doctrine applies to IUD manufacturers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- John Crumpton, IV v. Daryl Gates Tom Bradley Tom Reddin Ed Davis Herbert Boeckmann Maxwell E. Greenberg Barbara L. Schlei Robert TalcottNinth Circuit· 1991-11-04· cited 1,037×
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 738×
- Ralston v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-12-26· cited 310×
- Sawyer v. Southwest Airlines Co.D. Kansas· 2003-03-18· cited 131×
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1999-12-07· cited 130×
- Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-04· cited 111×
- Garcia-Paz v. Swift Textiles, Inc.D. Kansas· 1995-01-02· cited 104×
- Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-07· cited 67×
- Lewis v. ThompsonSecond Circuit· 2001-05-22· cited 64×
- Miller v. Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & GlassmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-23· cited 61×
- Wiersma v. MAPLE LEAP FARMSSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 58×
- Fusaro v. First Family Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-02· cited 52×
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 43×
- Bolin v. Cessna Aircraft Co.D. Kansas· 1991-03-06· cited 42×
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsD. Kansas· 1996-05-24· cited 33×
- State Ex Rel. Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 30×
- Schweitzer-Reschke v. Avnet, Inc.D. Kansas· 1995-01-06· cited 29×
- Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2013-01-11· cited 28×
- In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationE.D. Texas· 2002-08-14· cited 27×
- Rambo v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-11-20· cited 26×
Cites
66 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reyes v. Wyeth LaboratoriesFifth Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 219×
- Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-08-08· cited 211×
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court· 1974-11-15· cited 179×
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-10-27· cited 178×
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1968-01-22· cited 165×
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationFirst Circuit· 1981-04-07· cited 157×
- Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-04-27· cited 146×
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1978-04-27· cited 139×
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-05-02· cited 134×
- MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-02-28· cited 134×
- Hamilton v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals· 1976-03-18· cited 103×
- Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationSecond Circuit· 1980-12-08· cited 102×
- Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-06-12· cited 100×
- Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-04-29· cited 99×
- State Ex Rel. Odham v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-03-12· cited 98×
- Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-07-13· cited 95×
- Bonbrest v. KotzDistrict of Columbia· 1946-03-06· cited 94×
- Hoffman v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Third Circuit· 1973-08-08· cited 94×
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-03-29· cited 93×
- Amadio v. LevinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-04· cited 90×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.