· 10/27/2000
Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
Citations
- 618 N.W.2d 827
- 260 Neb. 552
- 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 952
- 2000 Neb. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The comment will apply to except the prescription drug product from strict liability when it is shown that (1) the product is properly manufactured and contains adequate warnings, (2) its benefits justify its risks, and (3
- “Express warranty is grounded in terms of an express promise made as part of a pending purchase. Thus, unlike implied warranties, there is a clearer contractual difference between a theory of recovery based on express warranty and a tort theory of recovery based on a product defect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.