Nebraska Supreme Court· 10/27/2000
Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
Citations
- 618 N.W.2d 827
- 260 Neb. 552
- 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 952
- 2000 Neb. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The comment will apply to except the prescription drug product from strict liability when it is shown that (1) the product is properly manufactured and contains adequate warnings, (2) its benefits justify its risks, and (3
- “Express warranty is grounded in terms of an express promise made as part of a pending purchase. Thus, unlike implied warranties, there is a clearer contractual difference between a theory of recovery based on express warranty and a tort theory of recovery based on a product defect.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendry, Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pitts v. Genie Indus., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-01-18· cited 216×
- Jay v. Moog Automotive, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-11-08· cited 112×
- Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-04· cited 111×
- Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-05-18· cited 107×
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2001-01-19· cited 105×
- Shuck v. CNH AMERICA, LLCEighth Circuit· 2007-08-21· cited 104×
- Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-21· cited 101×
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2003-08-08· cited 61×
- Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court· 2016-01-21· cited 54×
- Wilke v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-06· cited 49×
- In re Accutane Litig.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2018-10-03· cited 48×
- In re Baycol Products LitigationD. Minnesota· 2003-09-17· cited 47×
- Centocor, Inc. v. HamiltonTexas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 43×
- Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 42×
- Bennett v. MadakasiraMississippi Supreme Court· 2002-03-21· cited 36×
- Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-12-04· cited 35×
- Bryant v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-07-16· cited 30×
- State Ex Rel. Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. KarlWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-06-29· cited 30×
- In Re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability LitigationE.D. Texas· 2002-08-14· cited 27×
- Moss v. Wyeth Inc.D. Connecticut· 2012-05-24· cited 21×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-07-30· cited 248×
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-31· cited 232×
- Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1987-09-11· cited 154×
- Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-08-09· cited 118×
- Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-07-16· cited 90×
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court· 1987-02-04· cited 86×
- Armentrout v. FMC Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-12-14· cited 79×
- United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-04-13· cited 77×
- Gibb v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1994-07-15· cited 70×
- Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.Utah Supreme Court· 1991-05-14· cited 57×
- Haag v. BongersNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-02-12· cited 55×
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-12· cited 53×
- Tansy v. Dacomed Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1994-12-20· cited 49×
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-07-07· cited 44×
- Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Bank v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-06-13· cited 43×
- Adams v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 39×
- Castrignano v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1988-08-03· cited 38×
- Sita v. Danek Medical, Inc.E.D. New York· 1999-03-29· cited 34×
- Shanks v. Upjohn Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 31×
- Ackles v. LuttrellNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-04-11· cited 29×
Other cases named Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.