Utah Supreme Court· 2/9/1983
Hill v. Hartog
Citations
- 658 P.2d 1206
- 1983 Utah LEXIS 966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Evidence which is [inadmissible] for one purpose cannot be excluded if it is admissible [for] another purpose.”
- \Evidence which is [inadmissible] for one purpose cannot be excluded if it is admissible [for] another purpose.\
- “Evidence which is [inadmissible] for one purpose cannot be excluded if it is admissible [for] another purpose.”
- evidence which is improper for one purpose cannot be excluded if it is admissible for another purpose
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oaks, Hall, Stewart, Howe, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 2004-04-16· cited 68×
- Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-12-29· cited 40×
- Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. TannerUtah Supreme Court· 1987-06-19· cited 20×
- Sydenstricker v. MohanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-06-30· cited 16×
- Redevelopment Agency of Roy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1987-10-15· cited 7×
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2016-10-27· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court· 1950-09-16· cited 36×
- Bradford v. Alvey & SonsUtah Supreme Court· 1980-12-01· cited 18×
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1969-09-09· cited 18×
- Scott v. ScottUtah Supreme Court· 1967-07-21· cited 15×
- Taylor v. MazzolaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1962-10-01· cited 13×
- McElwain v. SchuckertCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-12-10· cited 11×
- Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 1978-04-24· cited 7×
- Edwards' Pet Supply v. BentleyUtah Supreme Court· 1982-07-06· cited 3×
- Hockett v. Salem Private SchoolsOregon Supreme Court· 1977-09-13· cited 2×
- Stevens v. MemmottUtah Supreme Court· 1959-03-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.