Taylor v. Mazzola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court erred by excluding plaintiff’s rebuttal testimony that refuted defendant’s and officer’s testimony, even though such testimony also supported plaintiff’s case-in-chief
• \A party is not required to anticipate the testimony the opposing party will offer in defense.\
• such rebuttal evidence is admissible even if it tended to support plaintiffs case in chief
• “A party is not required to anticipate the testimony the opposing party will offer in defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).