Taylor v. Mazzola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court erred by excluding plaintiff’s rebuttal testimony that refuted defendant’s and officer’s testimony, even though such testimony also supported plaintiff’s case-in-chief
• \A party is not required to anticipate the testimony the opposing party will offer in defense.\
• such rebuttal evidence is admissible even if it tended to support plaintiffs case in chief
• “A party is not required to anticipate the testimony the opposing party will offer in defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Warden v. Exempla, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2012-12-20· cited 199×
• People v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-02-13· cited 35×
• Deeds v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-12-21· cited 27×
• Karakehian v. Boyer
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-07-24· cited 14×
• Clark v. Buhring
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1988-09-07· cited 9×
• Jones v. Feiger, Collison & Killmer
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-09-11· cited 9×
• Hill v. Hartog
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-02-09· cited 7×
• People v. Silburn
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1990-06-28· cited 5×
• Bereal v. Bajaj
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2016-04-01· cited 4×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Ofstad v. Sarconi
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1955-05-16· cited 1×