Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \failure to make a proffer as to what his evidence would show precludes him from asserting on appeal that the exclusion was error\
• holding that “failure to make a proffer as to what his evidence would show precludes him from asserting on appeal that the exclusion was error”
• finding improper interpretation of statutory language that “would make ... phrases ... surplusage and meaningless”
• statutes should be read so as to avoid making any of their provisions “sur-plusage and meaningless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).