Skip to main content

Hicks v. State

Citations

  • 929 So. 2d 13
  • 2006 WL 197200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in stolen item because he did not lawfully possess it; therefore, he was not entitled to suppression of stolen item in a prosecution for offenses relating to stolen item
  • noting that the term standing is used when determining whether the defendant’s constitutional rights were violated, which includes the threshold inquiry of whether the defendant has a reasonable expectation of privacy
  • no reasonable expectation of privacy in a stolen computer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Villanti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.