United States v. Raymond Wong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying plain view doctrine to discovery of child pornography in the context of a valid search of a computer for evi- dence related to a murder investigation
• upholding denial of motion to suppress where the officer continued his warrant authorized search of the defendant’s computer for, among other things, “[a]ny maps, receipts, or writings, depicting Churchill County Nevada” after discovering child pornography
• \[A] person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an item in which he has no possessory or ownership interest[.]\
• “The specificity of the items listed in the warrant combined with the language . . . directing officers to ‘obtain data as it relates to this case’ from the computers is sufficiently specific to focus the officer’s search.”
• “Probable cause exists if it would be reasonable to seek the evidence in the place indicated in the affidavit.” (cleaned up) (quoting United States v. Peacock, 761 F.2d 1313, 1315 (9th Cir. 1985), abrogated on other grounds by Gomez v. United States, 490 U.S. 858 (1989))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).