Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 135 So. 3d 1092
  • 2013 WL 4436568
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where “there was no finding or agreement that the motion was disposi-tive, [the defendant] may not appeal the denial of the motion”
  • stating that the motion seeking suppression of evidence obtained from a computer tablet was not dispositive as the State \may have [nonetheless] been able to proceed to trial\ based upon the additional evidence possessed by the State
  • stating that the motion seeking suppression of evidence obtained from a computer tablet was not dispositive as the State \may have [nonetheless] been able to proceed to trial\ based upon the additional evidence possessed by the State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Casanueva, Only, Wallace

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.