Skip to main content

Hickey v. Scott

Citations

  • 738 F. Supp. 2d 55
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96949
  • 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 506
  • 2010 WL 3700783

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the appropriate sanction is to require [the offending party] to pay for the ‘reasonable attorney’s fees” the opposing party incurred in defending against the sanctionable claims and moving for Rule 11 sanctions
  • declining to determine whether imposing constructive trust would be appropriate before end of litigation
  • “‘A motion to strike is considered an exceptional remedy and is generally disfavored, and the proponent of such motion must shoulder a formidable burden.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hickey v. Scott

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.