Hickey v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hether an entity is a participant . . . is not dispositive; 3 Intel puts it in the context of whether the foreign tribunal has the authority to order an entity 4 to produce the disputed evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Legal Technology Group, Inc. v. Mukerji
  District of Columbia· 2019-06-10
• Matiella v. Murdock Street LLC
  District of Columbia· 2024-08-28

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. Bassin
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-07-17· cited 110×
• Anne P. Hendry v. Francis J. Pelland and Sadur, Pelland & Rubinstein, P.C.
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-03-05· cited 68×
• Dalo v. Kivitz
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-07· cited 49×
• Mark Keshishian & Sons, Inc. v. Washington Square, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-04-24· cited 47×
• Wagman v. Lee
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-02-23· cited 39×
• Zanville v. Garza
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-07-20· cited 24×
• Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CTIA—The Wireless Ass'n
  District of Columbia· 2007-02-13· cited 24×
• Croley v. Republican National Committee
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-09-21· cited 21×
• Rosenthal v. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, LLP
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-24· cited 19×