Kaempe, Staffan v. Myers, George

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that public records, including agency documents, are “subject to judicial notice on a motion to dismiss”
• holding that administrative documents were properly considered in ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss, in particular because “they [were] referred to in the complaint and [were] integral” to one of plaintiff’s claims
• explaining that a court need not “accept as true the complaint’s factual allegations insofar as they contradict exhibits to the complaint”
• explaining that a court need not “accept as true the complaint’s factual allegations insofar as 16 they contradict exhibits to the complaint”
• explaining that the court need not “accept as true the complaint’s factual allegations insofar as they contradict . . . matters subject to judicial notice”
• observing that, at the pleadings stage, a court need not accept as true allegations that “contradict exhibits to the complaint”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).