Sharp v. Rosa Mexicano, D.C., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that ADA claim was moot when there was single violation and defendant claimed that it had resolved the alleged violation
• finding that plaintiff may not, “through summary judgment briefs, raise [ ] new claims”
• stating that a plaintiff may not, “through summary judgment briefs, raise . . . new claims . . . because plaintiff did not raise them in his complaint, and did not file an amended complaint”
• finding plaintiff’s ADA claim moot where undisputed record evidence demonstrated that defendant's facility was in fact ADA compliant
• dismissing as moot claims seeking installation of wheelchair accessible sinks when defendant installed the specific architectural modifications requested by plaintiff “because structural modifications are unlikely to be altered in the future”
• The plaintiff could not raise “additional violations of the ADA not mentioned in the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).