Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/20/2007
Herriman v. May
Citations
- 174 P.3d 156
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Juries have considerable latitude in assessing damages, and a jury verdict will not be lightly overturned. Palmer v. Jensen, 132 Wash.2d 193, 197, 937 P.2d 597 (1997
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schultheis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1987-10-15· cited 212×
- Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 92×
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1967-01-05· cited 81×
- Levy v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1978-11-09· cited 78×
- Bunch v. King County Department of Youth ServicesWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 69×
- Bunch v. KING COUNTY DEPT. OF YOUTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 65×
- Robinson v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1989-07-27· cited 56×
- Hill v. GTE Directories Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-24· cited 42×
- McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court· 1954-12-02· cited 28×
- Hendrickson v. KonopaskiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-11-13· cited 14×
- Gestson v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-11· cited 11×
- Gestson v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-01· cited 8×
Other cases named Herriman v. May
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.