Gestson v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the trial court's order omits an issue, a reviewing court can look to its oral decision
• holding that when the trial court’s order omits an issue, a reviewing court can look to its oral decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Herriman v. May
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-12-20· cited 15×
• State v. Stout
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-02· cited 12×
• Fahndrich v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-28· cited 10×
• In Re Detention of Stout
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-10· cited 10×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Palmer v. Jensen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-05-29· cited 92×
• James v. Robeck
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-11-18· cited 68×
• Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1964-12-31· cited 62×
• Wooldridge v. Woolett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-12-31· cited 54×
• Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-12-13· cited 43×
• Olpinski v. Clement
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-06-06· cited 39×
• Knecht v. Marzano
  Washington Supreme Court· 1964-11-19· cited 37×
• Kohfeld v. United Pacific Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-01-21· cited 25×
• Jarstad v. Tacoma Outdoor Recreation, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-01-31· cited 24×
• Kohfeld v. United Pacific Ins. Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-02-24· cited 23×
• Gestson v. Scott
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-03-11· cited 11×
• Dybdahl v. Genesco, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-01-02· cited 9×
• Thogerson v. Heiner
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-16· cited 7×