United States v. Bobby D. Pulley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court's allowance of multiple representation to be harmless error
• finding no reason to “convert the singular into the plural” in interpreting Rule 615
• government may seek to exempt two agent-witnesses under different provisions of Rule 615
• “‘A’ representative, like ‘a’ natural person, ‘a’ police officer, and ‘an’ officer or employee, is singular.”
• “There is no strict requirement that the defendant prove prejudice in a situation such as this, but we nevertheless remain bound by the harmless error rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).