United States v. James K. Farnham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a violation of Rule 615 does not require vacatur of con- victions if the error was harmless
• holding trial court's allowance of multiple representation to be presumptively reversible error: other party need not even show prejudice
• stating that under Rule 615 \we remain bound by the harmless error rule.\
• finding violation of Rule 615 not harmless when two agents testified regarding their personal knowledge of the same events
• the government is generally permitted to have one case agent in the courtroom during trial
• “Although Rule 615 does not require that [the defendant] show prejudice, we remain bound by the harmless error rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).