Supreme Court· 2/25/2020

Hernandez v. Mesa

Citations

589 U.S. 93
140 S. Ct. 735
206 L. Ed. 2d 29

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the plaintiff’s Bivens claim arose in a new context, and factors, including the potential effect on foreign relations, counseled hesitation with respect to extending Bivens
holding that no remedy exists to recover damages from federal officers for an allegedly unconstitutional cross-border shooting
holding that Bivens does not extend to claims against executive officials brought by foreign nationals
recognizing that the list is not exhaustive and identifying “separation-of-powers principles” as being central to the analysis
holding that expansion of Bivens is a disfavored judicial activity and the Supreme Court has \consistently rebuffed requests to add to the claims allowed under Bivens\
holding that the plaintiff’s Bivens claim arose in a new context, and factors, including the potential effect on foreign relations, counseled hesitation with respect to extending Bivens

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

109 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hernandez v. Mesa

11 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.