Hernandez-Carrera v. Carlson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding administrative interpretation of statute regarding detention of certain aliens that did not provide for right to jury trial
• upholding regulation contrary to Supreme Court decision after applying Brand X
• upholding regulation contrary to Supreme Court decision after applying Brand Z
• “It is well established that the canon of constitutional avoidance does constrain an agency’s discretion to interpret statutory ambiguities, even when Chevron deference would otherwise be due.”
• “It is well established that the canon of constitutional avoidance does constrain an agency’s discretion to interpret statutory ambiguities, even when Chevron deference would otherwise be due.”
• “It is well established that the canon of constitutional avoidance does constrain an agency’s discretion to interpret statutory ambiguities, even when Chevron deference would otherwise be due.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).