· 10/10/2006
Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Roy
Citations
- 465 F.3d 1150
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25299
- 2006 WL 2867993
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a plaintiff had established redressability where “the injury would be redressed by a declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement”
- noting that “significant or substantial” language gives the officials a standard that “satisfies this court that such a risk is not present to such a degree as to justify facial invalidation”
- distinguishing between laws “with flexible and reasonably broad terms that still provide the necessary guidance” versus “laws lacking any standard of conduct whatsoever”
- “Although there may be instances where an adult bookstore would be unsure of whether its stock, floorspace, or revenue is made up of a ‘significant or substantial portion’ of adult material, there are myriad instances in which it would not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Ebel, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.