Skip to main content
· 10/10/2006

Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Roy

Citations

  • 465 F.3d 1150
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 25299
  • 2006 WL 2867993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a plaintiff had established redressability where “the injury would be redressed by a declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement”
  • noting that “significant or substantial” language gives the officials a standard that “satisfies this court that such a risk is not present to such a degree as to justify facial invalidation”
  • distinguishing between laws “with flexible and reasonably broad terms that still provide the necessary guidance” versus “laws lacking any standard of conduct whatsoever”
  • “Although there may be instances where an adult bookstore would be unsure of whether its stock, floorspace, or revenue is made up of a ‘significant or substantial portion’ of adult material, there are myriad instances in which it would not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Ebel, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.