Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases and citing Restatement (First) of Torts § 766 (1939)
• collecting cases and citing Restatement (First) of Torts § 766 (1939)
• “[I]n the absence of factual allegations that the employment contracts were breached or terminated with resulting damage to plaintiffs, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for damages for malicious interference with contract.”
• third-party inducement theories have \been repeatedly reaffirmed in this State\
• Restatement of the Law of Torts § 766

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).