Henry H. HALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Ninth Circuit adopted this interpretation and that the parties didn’t object to it
• noting that the federal-sector provision of Title VII, § 2000e-16, has been interpreted to incorporate the private-sector provision of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a)
• analyzing a federal employee's Title VII retaliation claim without conducting a separate \personnel action\ inquiry
• analyzing retaliation against federal employer under § 2000e-3(a), observing that § 2000e-16 “has been interpreted to incorporate” § 2000e-3(a)
• analyzing a federal employee’s Title VII retaliation claim without conducting a separate “personnel action” inquiry
• “Technically the suit is under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 rather than 2000e-3(a), because 2000e-16 is the only pro- vision under which agencies of the federal government can be sued. How- ever, 16 has been interpreted to incorporate 3(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).