International Marketing, Limited v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Inc., and Swift-Eckrich, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact-finding is not appropriate at Rule 12(b)(6) stage, but reliance on the parol evidence rule is permitted when the “contract[ ] evidence[s] integration on [its] face”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).