· 11/10/1980
Belden Corp. v. InterNorth, Inc.
Citations
- 413 N.E.2d 98
- 90 Ill. App. 3d 547
- 45 Ill. Dec. 765
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 4261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a party with a prospective business relationship “must allow for the rights of others” and therefore has “no cause of action against a bona fide competitor unless the circumstances indicate unfair competition”
- noting that a party with a prospective business relationship “must allow for the rights of others” and therefore has “no cause of action against a bona fide competitor unless the circumstances indicate unfair competition”
- “[t]he sacrosanct contractual relation takes precedence over the conflicting rights of any presumptive interferor, including his right to compete and his own prospective advantage”
- “The rights of others most commonly take the form of lawful competition, which constitutes a privileged interference with another’s business.”
- discharge was result of intentional and unjustified action of another
- discharge was result of intentional and unjustified action of another
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stamos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.