Skip to main content
· 11/10/1980

Belden Corp. v. InterNorth, Inc.

Citations

  • 413 N.E.2d 98
  • 90 Ill. App. 3d 547
  • 45 Ill. Dec. 765
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 4261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a party with a prospective business relationship “must allow for the rights of others” and therefore has “no cause of action against a bona fide competitor unless the circumstances indicate unfair competition”
  • noting that a party with a prospective business relationship “must allow for the rights of others” and therefore has “no cause of action against a bona fide competitor unless the circumstances indicate unfair competition”
  • “[t]he sacrosanct contractual relation takes precedence over the conflicting rights of any presumptive interferor, including his right to compete and his own prospective advantage”
  • “The rights of others most commonly take the form of lawful competition, which constitutes a privileged interference with another’s business.”
  • discharge was result of intentional and unjustified action of another
  • discharge was result of intentional and unjustified action of another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.