Hengels v. Gilski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an investigator’s report did not constitute admissible evidence for impeachment purposes because the report failed to reflect adequate firsthand knowledge of the witness’ statement
• an investigator's report did not constitute admissible evidence for impeachment purposes because the report failed to reflect adequate firsthand knowledge of the witness' statement
• knowledge possessed by employee may be imputed to employer
• knowledge possessed by employee may be imputed to employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).