Thurmond v. Monroe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• traffic convictions are not admissible evidence, but guilty pleas in traffic cases can be admitted as admissions against interest
• a treating physician’s opinion about the permanency of the plaintiff’s condition was not barred despite a gap of several years between the time of the doctor’s examination and the time of trial
• traffic convictions not admissible, but guilty pleas in traffic cases are admissible
• a treating physician's 18 No. 1-13-2015 opinion about the permanency of the plaintiff's condition was not barred despite a gap of several years between the time of the doctor's examination and the time of trial
• a treating physician's 18 No. 1-13-2015 opinion about the permanency of the plaintiff's condition was not barred despite a gap of several years between the time of the doctor's examination and the time of trial
• traffic convictions not admissible, but guilty pleas in traffic cases are admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).