Brooke Inns, Inc. v. S & R HI-FI AND TV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Generally, the proponent of excluded testimony is limited on appeal to the grounds for admissibility raised in the circuit court.”
• court found that references made during closing arguments lacked sufficient supporting evidence but that error was harmless, noting that court instructed jury that a counsel’s arguments were not evidence
• court found that references made during closing arguments lacked sufficient supporting evidence but that error was harmless, noting that court instructed jury that a 11 1-07-3454 counsel's arguments were not evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).