Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/19/1993

Van Steemburg v. General Aviation, Inc.

Citations

611 N.E.2d 1144
243 Ill. App. 3d 299
183 Ill. Dec. 496
1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where the defendant failed to call its witness, and the plaintiffs expert’s testimony was not comparable to the defendant’s expert’s testimony, missing-witness instruction should have been given
holding that where the defendant failed to call its witness, and the plaintiff's expert's testimony was not comparable to the defendant's expert's testimony, missing-witness instruction should have been given
noting that a party “is entitled to establish negligence by circumstantial evidence alone”
“A party may not, in the guise of impeachment, offer a prior statement of a witness as substantive evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.