Van Steemburg v. General Aviation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the defendant failed to call its witness, and the plaintiffs expert’s testimony was not comparable to the defendant’s expert’s testimony, missing-witness instruction should have been given
• holding that where the defendant failed to call its witness, and the plaintiff's expert's testimony was not comparable to the defendant's expert's testimony, missing-witness instruction should have been given
• noting that a party “is entitled to establish negligence by circumstantial evidence alone”
• “A party may not, in the guise of impeachment, offer a prior statement of a witness as substantive evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).