Skip to main content

Hendrix v. State

Citations

  • 908 So. 2d 412
  • 2005 WL 1577707

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing de novo trial court's application of law to claim that government withheld material evidence
  • \[A]ppellate counsel may not be deemed ineffective for failing to challenge an unpreserved issue on direct appeal unless it resulted in fundamental error.\ (citing Rutherford v. Moore , 774 So.2d 637 , 646 (Fla. 2000) )
  • \[A]ppellate counsel may not be deemed ineffective for failing to challenge an unpreserved issue on direct appeal unless it resulted in fundamental error.\ (citing Rutherford v. Moore , 774 So.2d 637 , 646 (Fla. 2000) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.