Skip to main content
· 10/19/1999

Henderson v. Roadway Express

Citations

  • 720 N.E.2d 1108
  • 308 Ill. App. 3d 546
  • 242 Ill. Dec. 153
  • 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 945
  • 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that anti-assignment provision in structured settlement agreement was valid and enforceable
  • noting that courts should harmonize provisions of a contract to avoid conflict
  • enforcing antiassignment clause that “specifically states [that the assignor] lacked the power to sell or anticipate his periodic payments, ‘by assignment or otherwise’ ” [emphasis added]
  • explaining that an annuity is an insurance policy
  • holding same under Illinois UCC
  • structured settlements help guarantee predictability for insurers, which is important for transactions involving long-term liabilities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.