Lawrence Hess v. Kanoski & Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing the Wage Payment Act and finding that contract language making a former employee “ ‘eligible to receive’ ” a bonus was not “the kind of unequivocal promise that is required under [the Wage Payment Act],” as “[e]ligibility, of course, is no guarantee”
• “[e]ligibility, of course, is no guarantee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).