In Re Nitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a structured settlement annuity was a policy of insurance
• acknowledging the \burdensome administrative problems\ and \increased legal and administrative expenses\ the insurer stated it would face if the court approved the transfer
• acknowledging the “burdensome administrative problems” and “increased legal and administrative expenses” the insurer stated it would face if the court approved the transfer
• rejecting waiver argument in part because letter acknowledged receipt of other contracting party’s correspondence but expressly reiterated contractual rights
• noting. Illinois legislature’s concern that structured settlement beneficiaries “were accepting offers of ready, but deeply discounted, cash from companies in exchange for their settlement annuity payments and then ending up penniless and without resources in the future”
• “any party to a case may seek appellate review from a final judgment that is adverse to his interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).