Grieve v. General American Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Vermont UCC did not void an anti-assignment clause in a similar structured settlement
• relying on the fact that annuity contracts are included in the statutes governing and regulating insurance to hold that annuity is exempt under Article 9
• “Structured settlement payments are non-assignable in order to preserve the injured person’s long-term financial security.”
• “This court will not lend its approval to the voiding of unambiguous, bargained-for contract terms in order to enable Singer to profit, at an exorbitant rate of interest, from Grieve’s financial distress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).